Can the Red Sox Organization Prove That They Still Care About Fans?
On March 2nd, it will have been 69 years since Norman Rockwell’s painting, The Rookie, was first published on the cover of The Saturday Evening Post. In this work from the Massachusetts-based artist, whose career helped shape the enduring look of 20th-century American life, a young man in street clothes stands in the middle of the Red Sox Spring Training locker room. He is presumably the titular newcomer, glove, bat, and duffel bag in hand, and he takes in the scene. Surrounding him are the established Boston players, including veteran Ted Williams, all readying themselves to take the field. They tie their cleats, adjust their hats, and don crisp white uniforms with the team’s signature red lettering across the front. The vignette is hopeful: arrivals, preparations, an individual and a collective on the starting line of a new season. All these years later, similar preparations are now taking place in Fort Myers for the descendants of those Rockwellian men. This time around, however, the preparation of uniforms was interrupted last week by a realization: the letters weren’t right.
The words “Red Sox” stitched on the front were too small and compact. The D and the S intersected with the jersey's red piping. Fans complained so much about the look that the team had to issue a public apology and a pledge to redesign the letters. This is the latest in a long line of grievances aired against Fanatics, the company in charge of uniforms for multiple professional sports leagues, including MLB. It is also the latest in a string of product blunders that the Sox have stumbled into. “Product” refers to jerseys and merchandise, but also the fan experience “product” of attending a game, as the franchise is being sued over unfair ticket pricing and hidden fees. Product also means the on-field product, the team talent itself. One of the richest clubs in baseball has been repeatedly criticized for underspending when it matters most. The hope of using the word product this many times is to drive a point home: through the emotional ups and downs of following sports, it is important to remember that a team is a business. Are the Red Sox providing sufficient value to the consumer? Is that even a priority for them, or any MLB team? What can change to better satisfy all parties involved?
About 45 miles west of Boston, an hour drive along pothole-clad I-90, is Worcester, home of the Sox’s AAA affiliate, the Worcester Red Sox. Affectionately known as the Woo Sox, the minor league squad began playing in 2021 after a relocation from Rhode Island. Just two years later, in late 2023, it was announced that the majority stake in the Woo Sox had been sold to Diamond Baseball Holdings. DBH is a private equity firm that owns over 40 minor league clubs across the country. This consolidation has only happened in the past few years, and the effects on the sport have not been thoroughly researched or profoundly realized. However, the ethos of private equity, which has grown in notoriety and infamy, is rapidly squeezing profit out of any owned properties, often regardless of its effect on the public or the employees of the property itself. Now, the ownership group of the Red Sox is entirely independent of the Woo Sox, but the wider culture that the private equity ethos has cultivated is a valuable reference point for the behavior of the big league franchise.
In January 2026, the nine-time World Series champions were sued by a group of fans for illegal ticket-selling practices. More specifically, the claims centered around junk fees, superfluous upcharges for things like “per-ticket fees” and “order fees”, and the closely related idea of drip-pricing, in which the cost of a ticket is gradually increased throughout the buying process. The issue is still being litigated, but it has left the ticket buyers of Boston with a bad taste in their mouths. That similar bad taste was reiterated, or retasted, a few weeks later with the Fanatics snafu. Fanatics has already been in hot water for years. Their takeover of professional sports uniforms and merchandise has been met with near-universal accusations of rapidly decreasing quality. The material is cheap and translucent; letting problems have also plagued many other teams. It is worth noting that Silver Lake, the parent company of Diamond Baseball Holdings, is an investor in Fanatics.
The flipside of all this outage directed at the Red Sox, their owner John Henry, and his company Fenway Sports Group, is that their spending has not reflected their earnings. This offseason featured an array of compelling talent that would have really aided a team that just fell short of a long 2025 playoff run. Yet, almost all that talent, including Red Sox third baseman Alex Bregman, moved to other cities across the league. Boston delivered consistently underwhelming offers for free agents, if delivering an offer at all. Now the Sox are left to return to their middling infield and crowded outfield. Moreover, there have been several high-profile cases of stars with big contracts being traded. The organization gave alternative reasons for trading Mookie Betts and Rafael Devers, for understandable reasons, but the story of not wanting to continue to pay them large salaries is the one that really stuck.
Though the issues listed above focus on the past few years, the prioritization of money in sports is not a new concept. The struggle lately for baseball fans is the demoralizing transparency, the inability of an organization to even properly feign correct priorities. What the Boston Red Sox should do over the course of the 2026 season is a rebuild. Not of the lineup, though that could use some juicing, but a rebuild of the institution. A stronger commitment to addressing the desires of those who love the team most. A reaffirmation that they are in it to win it, not to simply line their pockets. At the very least, close the curtain a little better so the public is not subjected to seeing the unruly mechanics of business.
In 2014, The Rookie was sold at auction for more than 22 million dollars. The buyer was anonymous; the painting’s current location is an unknown private collection. It is hard not to extrapolate the journey of that art, introduced to the world in a magazine worth 15 cents before being rendered inaccessible on a collector’s whim, to the story of baseball, of the Boston Red Sox. It is more expensive than ever to be a fan, and the reward for spending exorbitant sums is products of diminished quality. Perhaps John Henry can manage to find The Rookie’s new home and study Rockwell’s work. See the intricacies of the players’ faces, sizing up the young buck ready to take the field. Gaze upon the youngster himself, recall what it feels like to be on the outside looking in. Reflect on how he can quell the prioritizing of insiders and best support the outsiders, the people not employed by the Sox, or Fanatics or DBH, but love the team more than anything else in the world. Then maybe next Henry can track down the seller from the auction, ask to borrow a few of those millions, and buy some better jerseys.
